Subject: Re: For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:25:52 -0400

Sean Chittenden writes:
 > Because I want widget makers to be able to take OSSAL code, and use it
 > in proprietary products.

But that's what the FSF is doing!  Why don't you want them to do it?

 > The OSSAL lets widget makers who use the same set of modules,
 > ensure that any work on the modules that they have an interest in
 > (that is done in the public), will be usable to them in a product.

So?  Let's say that somebody wanted to donate a module back to you,
but they wanted to use a proprietary license?  You'd refuse it, right?
Why should the GPL be any different to you?

-- 
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com  | Can I recommend python?
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | Just a thought.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | -Dr. Jamey Hicks
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | 
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3