Subject: Re: For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:45:10 -0400

Mike Wattier writes:
 > > The OSI is a political organization 
 > 
 > yeah.. and IMHO this is the very reason that many who want to
 > support the Open Source community, will not do so. It is slowly
 > becoming a cheerleading section for the GPL.

Not really.  The GPL is legally troubled.  It attempts to do things
which require formation of a contract, and yet it explicitly claims to
not be a license but instead only copyright permissions.

The Open Software License is a better, if lesser known choice.

 > Well..there are those within the "community" to which the GPL is a
 > hindrance, plain and simple.

The only reason I can see for this is because you wish to siphon work
out of the community's tank.

 > Those of us who own small businesses have needs that are not being
 > met by currently defined OSI approved licenses,

Then devise a license which fits under the Open Source Definition.  No
worries, mate.

 > for doing this, however the trend on new license submissions is
 > always "use an existing license" or "use the GPL"

Indeed, yes.  License proliferation is a problem, particularly when
the terms conflict.

-- 
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com  | Can I recommend python?
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | Just a thought.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | -Dr. Jamey Hicks
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | 
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3