Subject: Re: Framework Licensing for Developer Flexibility
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 04:14:26 -0400

Randy Pearson scripsit:

> 3. The Modfied BSD and/or MIT license appear to be the closest to what we
> are looking for. 

If you want to ensure that your framework remains open source -- in
particular, that any improvements made to it are available to you --
then I recommend the Mozilla Public License.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British
Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence
of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1.  I doubt if
the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of
equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3