Subject: RE: OSD#5 needs a patch?
From: "Lawrence E. Rosen" <>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:02:02 -0700

Chuck Swiger wrote:
> In particular, I'd disagree 
> with the "field of endeavor" clause if it is to be applied to 
> exclude software 
> under a "free source but no-commercial-redistribution" 
> license from being 
> OSD-compliant.

Such licenses are not OSD-compliant.  They've been repeatedly rejected.

/Larry Rosen

license-discuss archive is at