Subject: Re: Why "open-source" means "free to distribute"?
From: Alex Rousskov <>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:01:16 -0600 (MDT)

On Thu, 6 May 2004, Fabian Bastin wrote:

> Just read carefully their page:
> ESL: Enterprise Source License
> OSL: OEM Source License
> None is an OSI approved license.

We do not know what OEM Source License is. It could be a BSD license,
for example (simply renamed for whatever reason).

> In particular, the Enterprise Source
> License is certainly not open-source

That much we do know.


license-discuss archive is at