Subject: Re: Dual licensing
From: Russell Nelson <>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 02:04:17 -0400

Marius Amado Alves writes:
 > and because your questioning indicates convergence with the SDC 
 > philosophy, which is really simple: it's open source, but if it's used 
 > commercially, then the authors get a cut.

I'm sorry, Marius, I'm confused.  How can be it open source, and yet
if used commercially, the authors get a cut?  That sounds much more
like the Aladdin Free Public License, but it's not an open source

--My blog is at  | The USA has turned into a
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | people that are afraid of
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | everything and responsible
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | FWD# 404529 via VOIP  | for nothing.  -- GF
license-discuss archive is at