Subject: Re: Dual license question
From: "J.M.Piulachs [Sand!]" <jmarc.piulachs@esand.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:41:43 +0200

I understood that he was helping me to find the right place to get an answer
to my question so all I can said is thanks for the suggestion and for the
answer.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "anon" <doris.pea@worldnet.att.net>
To: <license-discuss@opensource.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Dual license question


> > 1.  I note without particular objection that your question is
> off-topic
> > for this list.  Like practically all other recent posts, it hasn't had
>
> > anything to do with OSI or examining candidate licence for
> > OSD-compliance.
>
> If you didn't object you wouldn't note.
> Why don't you have OSI appoint you moderator?
> Otherwise hop on over to Slashdot with the rest of
> the obnoxious gamers and script-kiddies.
>
> Objection without Irritation Guy
>
>
>
> --
> license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
>
>


--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3