Subject: Re: testing kit conformance as a condition of distribution
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:10:05 -0400

Mitchell Baker scripsit:

> I believe the rationale is that 
> this is an acknowledgment, but a limitation on use in nuclear 
> facilities, and so it's OK.

Did you drop a "not" here?

> Would including this clause in a BSD-license be OK?

It would need separate approval, but I see nothing open source about it.
A more interesting question to my mind is, would it be GPL-compatible?
I think so, because it does not impose a restriction as such.

-- 
Henry S. Thompson said, / "Syntactic, structural,               John Cowan
Value constraints we / Express on the fly."     jcowan@reutershealth.com
Simon St. Laurent: "Your / Incomprehensible     http://www.reutershealth.com
Abracadabralike / schemas must die!"            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3