Subject: Re: Question about review process
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:24:26 -0400

Ian Foster scripsit:

> I'll look at the Academic Free License, but given the multi-year process 
> that has produced our current license, and the large numbers of 
> contributors and users, I suspect that a change may be difficult. 
> However, we will look into it.

Excellent.  In any case, please do take whatever steps are necessary
to change clause 4 to patent-license derivative works.

-- 
Using RELAX NG compact syntax to        John Cowan
develop schemas is one of the simple    http://www.reutershealth.com
pleasures in life....                   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Jeni Tennison                 <jcowan@reutershealth.com>