Subject: Re: For approval: MirOS Licence Template (and question about others)
From: Russell Nelson <>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:55:44 -0400

Thorsten Glaser writes:
 > Why? It's pretty common to leave out clause 3; most also leave out clause
 > 4; some leave out clauses 2 and 3 but not 4 (I've seen that when checking
 > for MirPorts), and minimal changes to the disclaimer "should" not be too
 > worrysome.
 > Of couse, if that's OSI policy, we'll have to live with it; in that case
 > I'll pick out the special cases and mail them.

Yes, you have to live with it.  It's a certification mark and we have
to control how it's used.  If we lose or give up that control, then
it's not a certification mark anymore.

--My blog is at  | Violence never solves
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | problems, it just changes
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 212-202-2318 voice | them into more subtle
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | FWD# 404529 via VOIP  | problems.