Subject: Re: Definition of open source
From: Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 15:39:32 -0800

Quoting Alan Rihm (alan@centraview.com):

> It seems to come down to opinions on what open source should be. My
> opinion is that there is room for another definition.

Cheeky.

Your attempting to establish such a definition would, I expect, result
in rather a large number of annoyed people giving you a hard time -- and
you would deserve it richly.  (OSI's certification mark would be
absolutely not available, in such cases, but your problems would only
start, there.)

Noted without comment:

> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627