Subject: Re: Definition of open source
From: Rick Moen <>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:47:24 -0800

Quoting Zvezdan Petkovic (zvezdan@CS.WM.EDU):

> I know.  The way he was proposing it, it was an oxymoron.  I just
> tried to be concise.  There have been enough long posts on the topic
> already.

Sorry for jumping on you.  I just get tired of the assertion that open
source is inherently "non-commercial" -- often floated by the various
people coming to this list and posting special-pleading requests that
OSI change its core nature for their special benefit.  You were directly
supporting their stance.