Subject: RE: For Approval: MN Open Content License 1.0
From: "Lawrence Rosen" <>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:54:00 -0800

> > However, I would like to understand exactly what problem you are trying
> > to solve that isn't well addressed by existing licenses.   In
> > particular, how does this handle documentation or other forms of
> > content better than, say, the AFL?
> The ASF does not require the source to be distributed along with the work.

Neither does the AFL. What is the problem you are trying to solve?

/Larry Rosen