[Threads by date]
[Messages by date]
[Subscribe To List]
[List FAQ]
By: Ben Tilly
July 2004
Re: The Non-Evil Monopolist
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Kent Beck's talk
August 2004
Re: Kent Beck's talk
Re: Kent Beck's talk
December 2004
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Reading material suggestions?
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
January 2005
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Reading material suggestions?
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Is Big Blue turning Red? IBM opens SW patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
February 2005
Re: What should Sun do?
Re: What should Sun do?
rocket science
March 2005
Re: CIO Magazine on Open Source
is there a statistician in the house? (long)
Software as a public service
April 2005
An Open Source version of Hailstorm and Passport
An Open Source version of Hailstorm and Passport
GPL v3 article - is this the public performance idea?
GPL v3 article - is this the public performance idea?
Standing on multi-authored works
May 2005
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Charging the Charger
July 2005
Meeting at OSCON?
November 2005
Re: Mass. Bill to Block OpenDocument Format Standard
March 2006
FSBs and mechanized documentation
Re: mechanised documentation and my business model solution
Re: mechanised documentation and my business model solution
Re: mechanised documentation and my business model solution
Articles about how to ensure sustainable quality and availibility?
April 2006
Re: mechanised documentation and my business model solution
Re: DRM-incompatible licenses
Re: GPLv3 draft
Re: GPLv3 draft
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: JBoss aquired by Red Hat
Re: JBoss aquired by Red Hat
Re: JBoss aquired by Red Hat
Re: JBoss aquired by Red Hat
May 2006
The term "intellectual property" considered useful
The term "intellectual property" considered useful
The term "intellectual property" considered useful
The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: VCs (was RE: The term "intellectual property" considered useful)
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
June 2006
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
Re: OCR
September 2006
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: idea futures markets (was Re: Tom W. Bell paper)
Re: idea futures markets
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: GIF/LZW patent
Re: GIF/LZW patent
October 2006
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: (c), but no year
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: GIF/LZW patent
October 2007
Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: offering pre-purchases
May 2008
Re: Example for displayng entity data based on condition given in drop-down in xml
Re: Example for displayng entity data based on condition given in drop-down in xml
August 2008
Re: Franklin Street Statement and Free Network Services
September 2008
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: slavery and freedom
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
December 2008
Re: Free *Network* Software Business?
Re: Free *Network* Software Business?
Re: Free *Network* Software Business?
July 2009
Assist a master's thesis on free software businesses?
September 2010
The Sociability of Free Software
[Threads by date]
[Messages by date]
[Subscribe To List]
[List FAQ]