[Threads by date]
[Messages by date]
[Subscribe To List]
[List FAQ]
By: Stephen J. Turnbull
October 2001
Re: Ransom (long) (was: Mandatory donations...)
Re: crux of the essence
Re: crux of the essence
Re: crux of the essence
Re: crux of the essence
Re: crux of the essence
Re: Perl OS? (was: torvalds)
Re: engineering counts
Re: engineering counts
Re: On topic. 'Signalling'
Re: The coming open monopoly in software
Re: The coming open monopoly in software
Re: The coming open monopoly in software
Re: low signal
Re: low signal
November 2001
Re: "I've got more programmers than you" reprise
Re: SONY TELLS AIBO HACKER "NO NEW TRICKS"
Re: Bug Bounties. Making $ from bugzilla.
Re: Bug Bounties. Making $ from bugzilla.
Re: Bug Bounties. Making $ from bugzilla.
Re: Bug Bounties. Making $ from bugzilla.
Re: Bug Bounties. Making $ from bugzilla.
December 2001
Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
Re: Thoughts on simputer?
Re: MS hiring open-source folks ?
January 2002
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
Re: *precisely* a commons (with tragedy)
Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
Re: Intellectual Property Reform
Re: How accurate is Metcalfe's law? (Was: Ximian software)
February 2002
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: Perens on arch
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: on "tax" (Re: improving project maintainership)
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: Perens on arch
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: Question: how to run a compiler business
Re: Understanding RMS
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: Free Software AND Open Source
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: Free Software vs. Open Source
Re: improving project maintainership
Re: Free Software vs. Open Source
Re: BSD, GPL and macroeconomics (This is a private question to JSS)
Re: Free Software vs. Open Source
Re: BSD, GPL and macroeconomics (This is a private question to JSS)
Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
Re: The stupidity of large companies
March 2002
Re: condescending to customers
Re: I wonder if Craig Mundie reads this list
Re: I wonder if Craig Mundie reads this list
Re: Development Shop FSB
Re: Development Shop FSB
Re: User-facing applications
Re: User-facing applications
Re: User-facing applications
May 2002
Re: Code Cheats in College
Re: Two python things
Re: Sustainable Computing Consortium -- a policy railroading vehicle?
June 2002
Re: What's the definition of "distribution"?
Re: What's the definition of "distribution"?
Re: The pony show.
Re: What's the definition of "distribution"?
Re: Choardic Commons
Re: Choardic Commons
Re: The Pledge model -- K5 generates 6 mos income in three days
Re: The Pledge model -- K5 generates 6 mos income in three days
Re: The Pledge model -- K5 generates 6 mos income in three days
Re: The Pledge model -- K5 generates 6 mos income in three days
Re: Chaordic Commons
July 2002
Re: Chaordic Commons
Re: Free Software vs. Disruptive Change
Re: Free Software vs. Disruptive Change
Re: Donation models
Re: Donation models
Re: Chaordic Commons
Re: Free Software vs. Disruptive Change
Re: Chaordic Commons
Re: Chaordic Commons
August 2002
Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
Re: endemic problem?
Re: endemic problem?
Re: [arch-dev] universities struggling to avoid making money
Re: [arch-dev] universities struggling to avoid making money
Re: [arch-dev] universities struggling to avoid making money
How FSBs and liberal economists can be allies [was: universities struggling to avoid making money]
Going private [was: universities struggling to avoid making money]
Re: project management (was Re: [lord@regexps.com: ... )
Re: selling SCM solutions
September 2002
Re: Open Source shareware?
Re: Open Source shareware?
Re: Open Source shareware?
Re: Open Source shareware?
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Mechanizing community information resources
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: towards a broader definition of an FSB
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: towards a broader definition of an FSB
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
October 2002
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Recommendations for Basic Economics Guide.
Re: Recommendations for Basic Economics Guide.
Re: Recommendations for Basic Economics Guide.
Re: Recommendations for Basic Economics Guide.
Re: Recommendations for Basic Economics Guide.
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: How FSBs and liberal economists can be allies [was: universities struggling to avoid making money]
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Recommendations for Basic Economics Guide.
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
[not part of the spew!] Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: up2date
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: update server alternatives
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: [not part of the spew!] Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: update server alternatives
Re: update server alternatives
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
November 2002
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: [coallesced replies] Re: how to create 21,780 new free software jobs (2,530 in R&D)
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: how to create 21,780 new free software jobs (2,530 in R&D)
Re: [coallesced replies] Re: how to create 21,780 new free software jobs (2,530 in R&D)
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: Successful FSBs
Re: free software parallel - environmentally friendly sector?
Re: [coallesced replies] Re: how to create 21,780 new free software jobs (2,530 in R&D)
December 2002
Re: dual-branding (was: Re: Paper on dual licensing)
Re: Copyright Law vs Contract Law.
January 2003
Re: a stocks and dividends question
Re: a stocks and dividends question
Re: back to topic (was Re: a stocks and dividends question)
Re: back to topic (was Re: a stocks and dividends question)
Re: back to topic (was Re: a stocks and dividends question)
Re: a stocks and dividends question
Re: back to topic (was Re: a stocks and dividends question)
Re: buybacks as class warfare
Re: back to topic (was Re: a stocks and dividends question)
Re: a stocks and dividends question
Re: a stocks and dividends question
Re: a stocks and dividends question
Re: truly back to topic, Info Week poll on open source
Re: Supreme Court declines Eldred.
February 2003
Re: Thoughts on free trade and white collar workers
Re: Thoughts on free trade and white collar workers
Re: Thoughts on free trade and white collar workers
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Thoughts on free trade and white collar workers
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: Ransom GPL Licensing: ethically and legally viable?
Re: that "discard" thing
Metastable oscillators
Re: hmm
March 2003
Re: hmm
Re: The upcoming state of IT
Re: Open Source Developer Exchange
Re: $1250
Re: Open Source Developer Exchange (Economics)
Re: Metastable oscillators
Re: Metastable oscillators
Re: Practical Thread: Advertising to businesses
Re: Software Foundation
Re: Text of SCO's complaint
Re: Asian Alliance to develop open source software.
Outside U.S. versus inside U.S.
Re: Outside U.S. versus inside U.S.
Re: Open Source Developer (Economics)
Re: Open Source Developer (Economics)
May 2003
Re: the source, so to speak, of the SCO lawsuit
July 2003
Re: Open Source companies with offices in San Francisco?
August 2003
Re: Lead developers vs 'Helpers'
Re: Lead developers vs 'Helpers'
December 2003
FSB economics/industry research suggestions requested
January 2004
Re: economic efficiency of free software
February 2004
Re: economic efficiency of free software
Re: economic efficiency of free software
Re: economic efficiency of free software
Re: economic efficiency of free software
Re: economic efficiency of free software
Re: economic efficiency of free software
Re: economic efficiency of free software
Re: economic efficiency of free software
Re: Interesting "almost open source" Microsoft tactic
March 2004
Re: Interesting "almost open source" Microsoft tactic
Re: open source policy across the globe
Re: open source policy across the globe
Re: open source policy across the globe
Re: open source policy across the globe
Re: Making money from open source
Re: open source policy across the globe
Re: Found on Newsforge: ABOUT FREE SOFTWARE Some Economic Aspects
Re: open source policy across the globe
Re: open source policy across the globe
Re: open source policy across the globe
Re: SMB Linux approaches?
Re: SMB Linux approaches?
Re: Hal's new white paper - Free Software/Public Sector
Re: Hal's new white paper - Free Software/Public Sector
April 2004
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
Re: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative
North Carolina initiatives [was: Wall Street article on a new Cooperative]
Re: Sample contracts for sponsored development?
May 2004
Re: Learning Curve; Software learning percentage.
Re: Learning Curve; Software learning percentage.
July 2004
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Re: The Non-Evil Monopolist
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Re: The Non-Evil Monopolist
August 2004
Re: Kent Beck's talk
Re: Kent Beck's talk
December 2004
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Reading material suggestions?
Need quotes for an article...
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Development vs. aquisition costs
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Development vs. aquisition costs
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Development vs. aquisition costs
January 2005
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: U.S. Falls out of the Index of Economic Freedom's Top 10
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Is Big Blue turning Red? IBM opens SW patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Is Big Blue turning Red? IBM opens SW patents
Is Big Blue turning Red? IBM opens SW patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
What should Sun do?
Re: Examples needed against Soft Patents
February 2005
Re: What should Sun do?
Epistemology of FS
Epistemology of FS
Re: What should Sun do?
Re: What should Sun do?
Epistemology of FS
Re: What should Sun do?
Re: need source for an oft-quoted stat
Re: commercial / proprietary
Re: commercial / proprietary
Re: Open Source funding?
Re: Drafting employment contracts for free-software authors
Re: Open Source funding?
rocket science
rocket science
March 2005
rocket science
Re: rocket science
Re: rocket science
Re: Journal / Trade Mag?
Re: rocket science
Re: rocket science
Re: rocket science
Re: Journal / Trade Mag?
Re: Journal / Trade Mag?
someone start a topic, please
Re: Journal / Trade Mag?
Re: is there a statistician in the house? (long)
Let's not forget the forest (was: is there a statistician in the house?)
Re: is there a statistician in the house? (long)
Re: is there a statistician in the house? (long)
Software as a public service
Software as a public service
Re: 'Fashion Victims' from The New Republic
April 2005
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Re: (c) permission on multi-authored works
Standing on multi-authored works
Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Standing on multi-authored works
Standing on multi-authored works
May 2005
Re: Charging the Charger
Open Source -> Closed Source
Re: Software as a public service
Open Source -> Closed Source
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Software as a public service
Open Source -> Closed Source
Down with the GPL!
Re: MySQL Patch Mechanism
Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Open Source -> Closed Source
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Software as a public service
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
Re: Charging the Charger
June 2005
HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux?
HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux?
HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux?
HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux?
HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux?
HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux?
July 2005
support for a small US college going GNU?
support for a small US college going GNU?
Re: Carriage return inserts in MS Exchange email -- fix?
Hypothetical Business Plan
August 2005
Option & Software Pricing
Re: Mozilla For Profit?
Re: Option & Software Pricing
Re: software patents in the wild
Re: software patents in the wild
Re: software patents in the wild
October 2005
Re: appliance-based business models
Re: appliance-based business models
Re: appliance-based business models
Re: appliance-based business models
Re: appliance-based business models
November 2005
Re: Mass. Bill to Block OpenDocument Format Standard
Re: Mass. Bill to Block OpenDocument Format Standard
Re: Mass. Bill to Block OpenDocument Format Standard
Re: Mass. Bill to Block OpenDocument Format Standard
Re: Mass. Bill to Block OpenDocument Format Standard
Re: Mass. Bill to Block OpenDocument Format Standard
Re: Mass. Bill to Block OpenDocument Format Standard
Communities as the new IPR?
Communities as the new IPR?
Communities as the new IPR?
Nessus 3.0's failed community
Nessus 3.0's failed community
March 2006
FSBs and mechanized documentation
Re: FSBs and mechanized documentation
April 2006
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
Re: Larry Ellison on FSBs
May 2006
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
Re: near/medium future digital media economics
June 2006
Re: patent trolls and X-licensors
September 2006
Tom W. Bell paper
Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
idea futures markets (was Re: Tom W. Bell paper)
Re: idea futures markets (was Re: Tom W. Bell paper)
Re: idea futures markets
Re: Software architecture matters
Re: Tom W. Bell paper
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd)
Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's mystery patent claims
Re: GIF/LZW patent
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's mystery patent claims
Re: GIF/LZW patent
Re: IC's mystery patent claims
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: IC's patent-pending technology
Re: "a better world" (was Re: GIF/LZW patent)
Re: "a better world" (was Re: GIF/LZW patent)
Re: "a better world" (was Re: GIF/LZW patent)
Re: A different patent covenant...
Re: "a better world" (was Re: GIF/LZW patent)
Re: termless copyright and patents
"incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
October 2006
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: mandatory patent auctions
mandatory patent auctions
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: mandatory patent auctions
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: mandatory patent auctions
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: termless copyright and patents
A Primer on Infringing Patents in Software
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: A Primer on Infringing Patents in Software
Re: A Primer on Infringing Patents in Software
Re: termless copyright and patents
Re: A Primer on Infringing Patents in Software
GPLv3 section 11
Re: GIF/LZW patent
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
December 2006
on software freedom and patents
Re: on software freedom and patents
Re: on software freedom and patents
Re: on software freedom and patents
Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
Re: "incentive void"
Looking for some input
filtering for expensive customers?
September 2007
Re: The GNU AGPL and Free Software Businesses
Re: The GNU AGPL and Free Software Businesses
Re: The GNU AGPL and Free Software Businesses
October 2007
small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
risk management
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: small worlds and better than ransom
Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: offering pre-purchases
So... Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: So... Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: So... Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: So... Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: So... Re: offering pre-purchases
Re: Business plan for Messieurs Lord & Turnbull
July 2008
Re: Patent prior art database
Re: Patent prior art database
software patents are (almost) good
Re: Patent prior art database
Re: Patent prior art database
August 2008
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
September 2008
Franklin Street Statement and Free Network Services
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: [fsb]Re: Franklin Street Statement and Free Network Services
Re: [fsb]Re: Franklin Street Statement and Free Network Services
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: [fsb]Re: Franklin Street Statement and Free Network Services
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: Competition by internal expertise for F/OSS vendors
Re: slavery and freedom
December 2008
Re: Free *Network* Software Business?
Re: Free *Network* Software Business?
Re: Free *Network* Software Business?
May 2009
Free Software Business Models
Re: Free Software Business Models
May 2010
Paul Fremantle on Open Source Business
Re: Paul Fremantle on Open Source Business
Re: Paul Fremantle on Open Source Business
Re: Paul Fremantle on Open Source Business
Re: Paul Fremantle on Open Source Business
[Threads by date]
[Messages by date]
[Subscribe To List]
[List FAQ]