By: Tom Lord

August 2001

• the Free Software Movement in Industry
• Re: the Free Software Movement in Industry
• Re: the Free Software Movement in Industry
• Re: the Free Software Movement in Industry
• how to organize programmers
• Re: the Free Software Movement in Industry
• Re: the Free Software Movement in Industry
• Re: how to organize programmers
• making devices

September 2001

• Re: making devices
• Re: Great Bridge closes.
• Re: Great Bridge closes.
• Re: As if the DMCA wasn't bad enough
• entrepreneurship, liberty, and U.S. copyright law
• Re: entrepreneurship, liberty, and U.S. copyright law
• Re: As if the DMCA wasn't bad enough
• Re: As if the DMCA wasn't bad enough
• in search of angels
• on copyright and digital media
• authentication systems (.NET, .GNU): Its the desktop, dummy.
• Re: authentication systems (.NET, .GNU): Its the desktop, dummy.
• Re: authentication systems (.NET, .GNU): Its the desktop, dummy.
• Re: authentication systems (.NET, .GNU): Its the desktop, dummy.
• Re: authentication systems (.NET, .GNU): Its the desktop, dummy.
• Re: authentication systems (.NET, .GNU): Its the desktop, dummy.
• Re: authentication systems (.NET, .GNU): Its the desktop, dummy.
• Re: Free software as a replacement for Microsoft
• Re: Free software as a replacement for Microsoft
• ok, FSBs created schwag; now bet the farm on something better
• Re: Free software as a replacement for Microsoft
• Re: ok, FSBs created schwag; now bet the farm on something better
• Re: Free software as a replacement for Microsoft
• Re: ok, FSBs created schwag; now bet the farm on something better
• implementing revenues
• the .NET battle ends
• Re: Objective IT review of Redhat
• Re: the .NET battle ends
• Re: the .NET battle ends
• Re: the .NET battle ends
• Re: the .NET battle ends
• Re: Objective IT review of Redhat
• Re: the .NET battle ends
• "Instead of satisfying their own customers' demand..."
• In defense of Bill
• Re: In defense of Bill
• the congressional mandate

October 2001

• "I've got more programmers than you"
• Re: "I've got more programmers than you"
• FSB support businesses through history
• Re: FSB support businesses through history
• [jbs@quiotix.com: Re: truth]
• Re: [jbs@quiotix.com: Re: truth]
• two FSB growth opportunities
• Re: "I've got more programmers than you"
• Re: "I've got more programmers than you"
• microsoft going after installed base
• open source process issue
• gross margins, R&D, S&M, G&A, and all that
• Re: gross margins, R&D, S&M, G&A, and all that
• Re: gross margins, R&D, S&M, G&A, and all that
• Re: "I've got more programmers than you"
• shooting holes in the sky
• Re: shooting holes in the sky
• Re: shooting holes in the sky
• Re: shooting holes in the sky
• Re: shooting holes in the sky
• avoiding tragedy of the commons (was Re: ... services model?)
• labor relations
• Re: Paying for development on a services model?
• Re: shooting holes in the sky
• Re: Paying for development on a services model?
• Re: shooting holes in the sky
• Re: Paying for development on a services model?
• Re: shooting holes in the sky
• Re: shooting holes in the sky
• Re: Mandatory donations or build from CVS...
• ransom
• the perpetually perplexing GPL
• crux of the essence
• Re: ransom
• Re: crux of the essence
• Re: ransom
• Re: crux of the essence
• Re: crux of the essence
• Re: crux of the essence
• impolitic statements (business model clues for the clueless)
• Re: impolitic statements (business model clues for the clueless)
• Re: impolitic statements (business model clues for the clueless
• Re: impolitic statements (business model clues for the clueless
• Re: impolitic statements (business model clues for the clueless
• SourceForge (was Re: impolitic statements (business model clues for the clueless))
• Re: SourceForge (was Re: impolitic statements (business model clues for the clueless))
• engineering counts
• torvalds
• X-box, MS, the net, and embedded systems
• Re: torvalds
• lab director duties
• ESR
• Re: engineering counts
• Re: lab director duties
• Re: ESR
• Re: lab director duties
• Re: torvalds
• Re: torvalds
• fixing everything
• a lemonade stand
• Cygnus Supoprt
• Re: crux of the essence

December 2001

• Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
• Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
• Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?

January 2002

• Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
• Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
• Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
• Re: Why would I pay for Ximian software?
• *precisely* a commons (with tragedy)
• Re: *precisely* NOT a commons (with tragedy)
• SSSCA news
• the model t

December 1996

• Re: the model t

January 2002

• arch lists
• Re: Washington Post: Rumor: AOL, RH, in aquisition talks
• Re: Washington Post: Rumor: AOL, RH, in aquisition talks
• Re: Washington Post: Rumor: AOL, RH, in aquisition talks
• cost of ownership
• x-box competition
• Re: x-box competition

February 2002

• open source processes, transaction costs, scaling Linus
• Perens on arch
• Re: Perens on arch
• Re: Perens on arch
• improving project maintainership
• on "tax" (Re: improving project maintainership)
• Re: improving project maintainership
• on "human nature" (Re: improving project maintainership)
• Re: improving project maintainership
• Re: improving project maintainership
• Re: Perens on arch
• Re: improving project maintainership
• Re: Perens on arch
• Re: Perens on arch
• Re: improving project maintainership
• FSBs' real competitors are consortiums (was Re: ... maintainership)
• Re: FSBs' real competitors are consortiums (was Re: ... maintainership)
• Re: FSBs' real competitors are consortiums (was Re: ... maintainership)
• Re: FSBs' real competitors are consortiums (was Re: ... maintainership)
• Re: FSBs' real competitors are consortiums (was Re: ... mai
• a tool free software developers need
• Re: a tool free software developers need
• Re: a tool free software developers need
• Re: free software business anyone?
• Re: a tool free software developers need
• RH in the news
• Towards an FSB customer bill-of-rights (Re: RH in the news)
• Re: free software business anyone?
• Re: free software business anyone?
• "business B" proven
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: The stupidity of large companies
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• linux kernel patches
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• [OT] Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• "buying": decision making vs. decision impact
• Re: Wal-mart drives software industry
• Re: "buying": decision making vs. decision impact

March 2002

• Re: Back to FSB: "buying": decision making vs. decision impact
• Re: Back to FSB: "buying": decision making vs. decision impact
• Re: Back to FSB: "buying": decision making vs. decision impact
• condescending to customers
• stupid customer tricks
• Re: condescending to customers
• Re: Date header.
• Re: "buying": decision making vs. decision impact
• I wonder if Craig Mundie reads this list
• The State of Arch
• Re: I wonder if Craig Mundie reads this list
• Re: I wonder if Craig Mundie reads this list
• network analysis
• Re: I wonder if Craig Mundie reads this list
• Re: I wonder if Craig Mundie reads this list
• Re: Development Shop FSB
• anti-MS FUD
• Re: Development Shop FSB
• Re: Development Shop FSB
• Re: Development Shop FSB
• Re: Development Shop FSB
• Re: Development Shop FSB
• the GCC steering committee
• Re: the GCC steering committee
• Re: the GCC steering committee
• Re: the GCC steering committee
• Re: the GCC steering committee
• Re: the GCC steering committee
• Re: the GCC steering committee
• Re: Miguel De Icaza interview
• How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• quick replies to various messages (Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe))
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: How to run an FSB R&D lab (maybe)
• Re: Introduction

April 2002

• Re: Red Hat Status
• Re: New FSB branding model

May 2002

• futures markets
• Re: futures markets
• Re: futures markets
• Re: futures markets
• The Gnu Economy
• United Linux, virtual spot markets
• contractless exchange of virtual perpetual copyrights
• Re: United Linux, virtual spot markets
• virtual copyright

June 2002

• rumour mill
• what counts as "exclusive right"?

July 2002

• should/can FSBs give grants?
• Re: Free Software vs. Disruptive Change
• Re: Public Software Fund
• a "new" (really quite old) FS R&D business model
• R&D Fundraising Business Models
• advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• endemic problem?
• Re: advice sought (really: fundraiser status)
• Re: advice sought
• Re: advice sought

August 2002

• Re: advice sought
• Re: advice sought
• semi non-sequitor
• universities struggling to avoid making money
• Re: [arch-dev] universities struggling to avoid making money
• in fact, that's a good formula
• Re: [arch-dev] universities struggling to avoid making money
• Re: in fact, that's a good formula
• Re: [arch-dev] universities struggling to avoid making money
• facist totalitarian beaurocracy zeitgeist
• what counts as distributing software?
• Re: [arch-dev] what counts as distributing software?
• Re: [arch-dev] what counts as distributing software?
• Re: [arch-dev] universities struggling to avoid making money
• Re: universities struggling to avoid making money
• [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]
• reviewing code
• [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]
• Re: arch advocates
• Re: arch advocates
• Re: arch advocates
• Re: reviewing code
• Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]
• Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]
• Re: arch advocates
• Re: reviewing code
• Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]
• Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]
• Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]
• the bug with microsoft
• Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]
• Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]
• perhaps no better than whimsy (sports analogies in business ;-)
• [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: [lord@regexps.com: Re: arch advocates]]]
• Re: arch advocates
• Re: reviewing code
• Re: selling SCM solutions
• Re: arch advocates
• Re: arch advocates
• Re: reviewing code
• Re: selling SCM solutions

---