Messages 114xx


00: Re: Tom W. Bell paper (Thomas Lord)
01: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
02: Re: Tom W. Bell paper (Santiago Gala)
03: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (simo)
04: Re: Tom W. Bell paper (Santiago Gala)
05: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
06: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (simo)
07: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
08: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
09: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Scott Capdevielle)
10: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Alan Hudson)
11: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
12: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Ben Tilly)
13: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (simo)
14: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
15: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Scott Capdevielle)
16: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
17: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Ben Tilly)
18: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Ben Tilly)
19: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Brian Behlendorf)
20: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Brian Behlendorf)
21: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
22: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Mark Wielaard)
23: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Jamie Lokier)
24: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Jamie Lokier)
25: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Jamie Lokier)
26: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Jamie Lokier)
27: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Jamie Lokier)
28: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (simo)
29: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (simo)
30: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Alan Hudson)
31: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (simo)
32: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
33: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Robin 'Roblimo' Miller)
34: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Robin 'Roblimo' Miller)
35: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Thomas Lord)
36: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Thomas Lord)
37: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Thomas Lord)
38: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (DV Henkel-Wallace)
39: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Jamie Lokier)
40: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Jamie Lokier)
41: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
42: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
43: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
44: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
45: Software Technology Transfer Using a Patent-Based Open Source Model (Rob Cameron)
46: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Brian Behlendorf)
47: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Thomas Lord)
48: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
49: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
50: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
51: ~True Employer Needs You~ (bizmarc)
52: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
53: Software Pricing (Lawrence Rosen)
54: Re: Software Pricing (Thomas Lord)
55: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Brian Behlendorf)
56: pull-the-trigger licensing (Thomas Lord)
57: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
58: Re: Software Pricing (Scott Capdevielle)
59: Software Licensing (Scott Capdevielle)
60: Re: Software Licensing (Stephen J. Turnbull)
61: Re: Software Licensing (Thomas Lord)
62: Re: termless copyright and patents (Stephen J. Turnbull)
63: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
64: Re: termless copyright and patents (Ben Tilly)
65: Re: Software Licensing (Stephen J. Turnbull)
66: Re: termless copyright and patents (Stephen J. Turnbull)
67: Re: termless copyright and patents (Stephen J. Turnbull)
68: Re: termless copyright and patents (David Fetter)
69: Re: termless copyright and patents (Ben Tilly)
70: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
71: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Brian Behlendorf)
72: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
73: Re: termless copyright and patents (Ben Tilly)
74: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
75: Re: termless copyright and patents (Stephen J. Turnbull)
76: Re: termless copyright and patents (Stephen J. Turnbull)
77: Re: termless copyright and patents (David Fetter)
78: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
79: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (simo)
80: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (simo)
81: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (stephen.xemacs.org)
82: Re: termless copyright and patents (stephen.xemacs.org)
83: Re: termless copyright and patents (stephen.xemacs.org)
84: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
85: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
86: Re: termless copyright and patents (stephen.xemacs.org)
87: Re: termless copyright and patents (stephen.xemacs.org)
88: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
89: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
90: IC's patent-pending technology (Lawrence Rosen)
91: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Thomas Lord)
92: Re: termless copyright and patents (simo)
93: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Lawrence Rosen)
94: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
95: Re: termless copyright and patents (simo)
96: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Thomas Lord)
97: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
98: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (simo)
99: Re: termless copyright and patents (simo)