Messages 115xx


00: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Thomas Lord)
01: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Lawrence Rosen)
02: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
03: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (simo)
04: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Ben Tilly)
05: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
06: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Thomas Lord)
07: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Thomas Lord)
08: Re: termless copyright and patents (stephen.xemacs.org)
09: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
10: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Brian Behlendorf)
11: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Brian Behlendorf)
12: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
13: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
14: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (stephen.xemacs.org)
15: Re: IC's patent-pending technology: Prior Art, Please (Rob Cameron)
16: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (stephen.xemacs.org)
17: Re: IC's patent-pending technology: Prior Art, Please (Thomas Lord)
18: Re: termless copyright and patents (Thomas Lord)
19: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Thomas Lord)
20: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
21: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
22: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
23: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
24: Re: termless copyright and patents (stephen.xemacs.org)
25: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
26: Re: IC's patent-pending technology: Prior Art, Please (Jamie Lokier)
27: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
28: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
29: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
30: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Rob Cameron)
31: Re: termless copyright and patents (Ben Tilly)
32: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Norbert Bollow)
33: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
34: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
35: FYI about IBM and patents (Lawrence Rosen)
36: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
37: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
38: Re: termless copyright and patents (stephen.xemacs.org)
39: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
40: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
41: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Thomas Lord)
42: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (Lawrence Rosen)
43: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
44: Re: Patent-based dual-licensing open source business model (simo)
45: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Jamie Lokier)
46: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Ben Tilly)
47: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
48: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Ben Tilly)
49: GIF/LZW patent (Lawrence Rosen)
50: Re: GIF/LZW patent (giles.oz.net)
51: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
52: Re: GIF/LZW patent (simo)
53: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Chris DiBona)
54: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Norbert Bollow)
55: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
56: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
57: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
58: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Santiago Gala)
59: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (stephen.xemacs.org)
60: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Federico Lucifredi)
61: Re: Software Licensing (Russ Nelson)
62: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Lawrence Rosen)
63: Re: Software Licensing (Bernard Lang)
64: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Chris DiBona)
65: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Russ Nelson)
66: Re: GIF/LZW patent (DV Henkel-Wallace)
67: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Chris DiBona)
68: Re: GIF/LZW patent (DV Henkel-Wallace)
69: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Chris DiBona)
70: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
71: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Thomas Lord)
72: Re: GIF/LZW patent (DV Henkel-Wallace)
73: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Thomas Lord)
74: "a better world" (was Re: GIF/LZW patent) (Norbert Bollow)
75: Re: Software Licensing (Thomas Lord)
76: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (simo)
77: Re: "a better world" (was Re: GIF/LZW patent) (simo)
78: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Robin 'Roblimo' Miller)
79: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Thomas Lord)
80: Re: "a better world" (was Re: GIF/LZW patent) (Jamie Lokier)
81: IC's mystery patent claims (Thomas Lord)
82: Re: IC's mystery patent claims (Thomas Lord)
83: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (simo)
84: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Ben Tilly)
85: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Jamie Lokier)
86: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Thomas Lord)
87: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Thomas Lord)
88: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (simo)
89: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Federico Lucifredi)
90: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Thomas Lord)
91: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Thomas Lord)
92: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (simo)
93: Re: IC's mystery patent claims (stephen.xemacs.org)
94: Re: IC's patent-pending technology (Rob Cameron)
95: Re: GIF/LZW patent (stephen.xemacs.org)
96: Re: IC's mystery patent claims (Thomas Lord)
97: Re: GIF/LZW patent (Thomas Lord)
98: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (Jamie Lokier)
99: Re: US Software Patents Hit Record High (fwd) (simo)