Messages 31xx


00: Re: Why software patents are bad (craig.jcb-sc.com)
01: Re: Why software patents are bad (L. Peter Deutsch)
02: Re: Why software patents are bad (Bernard Lang)
03: Re: Why software patents are bad (Stephen J. Turnbull)
04: Re: Why software patents are bad (craig.jcb-sc.com)
05: Re: Why software patents are bad (craig.jcb-sc.com)
06: Re: Why software patents are bad (craig.jcb-sc.com)
07: Re: Why software patents are bad (Stephen J. Turnbull)
08: Re: New angle on the patent problem (Karsten M. Self)
09: Re: Why software patents are bad (craig.jcb-sc.com)
10: Re: Online patent exchanges (Karsten M. Self)
11: A possible patent for the free software / Open Source world. (L. Peter Deutsch)
12: Re: New angle on the patent problem (Assaf Arkin)
13: Re: New angle on the patent problem (Stephen J. Turnbull)
14: Re: New angle on the patent problem (Karsten M. Self)
15: Re: New angle on the patent problem (Karsten M. Self)
16: Performance metrics of Open Source software. (Lacal Jose)
17: Re: Performance metrics of Open Source software. (Ben Laurie)
18: Re: Performance metrics of Open Source software. (William C. Cheng)
19: Re: Why software patents are bad (Bernard Lang)
20: Re: Why software patents are bad (Karsten M. Self)
21: Re: Why software patents are bad (Stephen J. Turnbull)
22: Re: Why software patents are bad (Bernard Lang)
23: Re: Why software patents are bad (Bernard Lang)
24: Re: Why software patents are bad (Karsten M. Self)
25: Re: Why software patents are bad (Stephen J. Turnbull)
26: Re: Why software patents are bad (Stephen J. Turnbull)
27: Re: EY invests in online patent exchange (Karsten M. Self)
28: Re: EY invests in online patent exchange (Stephen J. Turnbull)
29: Re: EY invests in online patent exchange (Brian Bartholomew)
30: Re: Open Content woes (L. Peter Deutsch)
31: Oracle's opposition to software patents (Michael A. Olson)
32: Re: Oracle's opposition to software patents (Karsten M. Self)
33: Re: Oracle's opposition to software patents (Brian Behlendorf)
34: Re: Why software patents are bad (Karsten M. Self)
35: Re: Open Content woes (Mark Stone)
36: Re: Why software patents are bad (Bernard Lang)
37: Re: Why software patents are bad (Stephen J. Turnbull)
38: Re: EY invests in online patent exchange (Stephen J. Turnbull)
39: Re: EY invests in online patent exchange (Alessandro Rubini)
40: How do you convince IBM to oppose software patents? [was: EY invests in online patent exchange] (Stephen J. Turnbull)
41: Re: How do you convince IBM to oppose software patents? (Alessandro Rubini)
42: Re: How do you convince IBM to oppose software patents? [was: EY invests in online patent exchange] (Bernard Lang)
43: Re: How do you convince IBM to oppose software patents? (shapj.us.ibm.com)
44: Re: How do you convince IBM to oppose software patents? (Bernard Lang)
45: Greetings.. (skud.netizen.com.au)
46: Re: You have probably all seen this (Ian Clarke)
47: Open Content woes (Mark Stone)
48: You have probably all seen this (Ben Tilly)
49: Re: You have probably all seen this (Gregory Aharonian)
50: Re: Open Content woes (Brian Bartholomew)
51: Re: Open Content woes (Bernard Lang)
52: Re: Why software patents are bad (Karsten M. Self)
53: Re: New angle on the patent problem (Karsten M. Self)
54: Re: Open Content woes (Richard Stallman)
55: Re: Open Content woes (Richard Stallman)
56: Re: Open Content woes (Richard Stallman)
57: Re: Open Content woes (Andrew C. Greenberg)
58: Re: Open Content woes (Russell Nelson)
59: Re: Open Content woes (William C. Cheng)
60: Re: Open Content woes (Mark Stone)
61: Re: Open Content woes (Mark Stone)
62: Re: Open Content woes (Mark Stone)
63: Re: Open Content woes (bruce.perens.com)
64: Virus considered deprecative (bruce.perens.com)
65: Viral anti-pessimism (Stig Hackvšn)
66: Re: Virus considered deprecative (Stig Hackvšn)
67: balance (Stig Hackvšn)
68: Re: Virus considered deprecative (bruce.perens.com)
69: Re: balance (bruce.perens.com)
70: Re: balance (Stig Hackvšn)
71: Re: balance (bruce.perens.com)
72: Re: Virus considered deprecative (Ben Laurie)
73: Re: Viral anti-pessimism (Bernard Lang)
74: Re: Open Content woes (Bernard Lang)
75: law from the bottom up (Stig Hackvšn)
76: Re: Open Content woes (Greg Broiles)
77: Re: law from the bottom up (Bernard Lang)
78: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (bruce.perens.com)
79: Re: Open Content woes (Elaine -HFB- Ashton)
80: The GPL is "inherited" (L. Peter Deutsch)
81: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (Karsten M. Self)
82: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (bruce.perens.com)
83: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (L. Peter Deutsch)
84: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (bruce.perens.com)
85: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (cbbrowne.godel.brownes.org)
86: Re: Open Content woes (Stephen J. Turnbull)
87: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Stephen J. Turnbull)
88: Re: How do you convince IBM to oppose software patents? (Stephen J. Turnbull)
89: Re: How do you convince IBM to oppose software patents? (Karsten M. Self)
90: Re: How do you convince IBM to oppose software patents? (Stephen J. Turnbull)
91: Any objections to a mailing list? (Ian Clarke)
92: Re: Why software patents are bad (Stephen J. Turnbull)
93: Re: Open Content woes (Ben Tilly)
94: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Russell Nelson)
95: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Ben Tilly)
96: Re: Any objections to a mailing list? (Russell Nelson)
97: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (DJ Delorie)
98: Re: law from the bottom up (shapj.us.ibm.com)
99: Marketing and Sales (DJ Delorie)