Messages 32xx


00: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (William C. Cheng)
01: Re: Marketing and Sales (John McDermott)
02: Re: Marketing and Sales (DJ Delorie)
03: Re: Open Content woes (Brian Bartholomew)
04: Re: Any objections to a mailing list? (Karsten M. Self)
05: Re: Why software patents are bad (Karsten M. Self)
06: Re: law from the bottom up (shapj.us.ibm.com)
07: Value pricing again (Karsten M. Self)
08: Re: Why software patents are bad (Ben Laurie)
09: Re: Why software patents are bad (Karsten M. Self)
10: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Paul Rohr)
11: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (L. Peter Deutsch)
12: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (bruce.perens.com)
13: Re: Virus considered deprecative (Richard Stallman)
14: Re: balance (Richard Stallman)
15: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Richard Stallman)
16: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (Richard Stallman)
17: Re: Open Content woes (Richard Stallman)
18: Using logos (Richard Stallman)
19: Re: Open Content woes (Richard Stallman)
20: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Bruce Perens)
21: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (Bruce Perens)
22: Patent Cross-License Agreement (Mark Shewmaker)
23: Re: balance (L. Peter Deutsch)
24: Re: balance (Russell Nelson)
25: Re: balance (L. Peter Deutsch)
26: Re: balance (Andrew C. Greenberg)
27: Re: balance (Andrew C. Greenberg)
28: Re: balance (Karsten M. Self)
29: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Richard Stallman)
30: Re: Open Content woes (Stephen J. Turnbull)
31: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Stephen J. Turnbull)
32: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Stephen J. Turnbull)
33: Marketing and Sales (Stephen J. Turnbull)
34: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Karsten M. Self)
35: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (Karsten M. Self)
36: Why just one word? (Re: "On Virus" -- get real) (Ian Clarke)
37: Why not let IBM do it (figure out the patent thing) (Karsten M. Self)
38: Re: Why software patents are bad (Stephen J. Turnbull)
39: Re: Why just one word? (Re: "On Virus" -- get real) (Bernard Lang)
40: Re: Why just one word? (Re: "On Virus" -- get real) (skud.netizen.com.au)
41: Re: Why just one word? (Re: "On Virus" -- get real) (Willem Konynenberg)
42: Re: balance (Richard Stallman)
43: Re: balance (Richard Stallman)
44: Re: balance (Richard Stallman)
45: Re: balance (Richard Stallman)
46: Re: law from the bottom up (Richard Stallman)
47: Re: Why just one word? (Re: "On Virus" -- get real) (Bernard Lang)
48: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Paul Rohr)
49: Re: balance (L. Peter Deutsch)
50: Re: law from the bottom up (shapj.us.ibm.com)
51: Re: balance (Bernard Lang)
52: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Paul Rohr)
53: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (bruce.perens.com)
54: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Crispin Cowan)
55: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (L. Peter Deutsch)
56: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Crispin Cowan)
57: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (L. Peter Deutsch)
58: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (bruce.perens.com)
59: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (bruce.perens.com)
60: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Brian Behlendorf)
61: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (L. Peter Deutsch)
62: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Karsten M. Self)
63: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (L. Peter Deutsch)
64: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Bernard Lang)
65: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (L. Peter Deutsch)
66: Re: [mark@primefactor.com: Patent Cross-License Agreement] (Karsten M. Self)
67: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Crispin Cowan)
68: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Bernard Lang)
69: Re: Open Content woes (Richard Stallman)
70: Re: "On Virus" -- get real (Richard Stallman)
71: Re: The GPL is "inherited" (Richard Stallman)
72: Re: Open Content woes (Richard Stallman)
73: screenshots and liability (Mark Stone)
74: Re: Open Content woes (Andrew C. Greenberg)
75: Re: screenshots and liability (Andrew C. Greenberg)
76: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Russell Nelson)
77: Re: [mark@primefactor.com: Patent Cross-License Agreement] (Russell Nelson)
78: Re: Open Content woes (Russell Nelson)
79: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (L. Peter Deutsch)
80: Possibly stupid GPL question (Ben Tilly)
81: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (bruce.perens.com)
82: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (DJ Delorie)
83: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (bruce.perens.com)
84: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (bruce.perens.com)
85: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (DJ Delorie)
86: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (Russell Nelson)
87: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (DJ Delorie)
88: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (Russell Nelson)
89: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (bruce.perens.com)
90: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (Alessandro Rubini)
91: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (L. Peter Deutsch)
92: "Not yet"? (DJ Delorie)
93: Re: brands, trademarks, and the GPL (Paul Rohr)
94: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (Karsten M. Self)
95: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (bruce.perens.com)
96: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (Ben Tilly)
97: Re: "Not yet"? (L. Peter Deutsch)
98: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (L. Peter Deutsch)
99: Re: Possibly stupid GPL question (bruce.perens.com)