[<<-]
[<-]
[->]
[->>]
|
[Threads by date]
[Subscribe To List]
[List FAQ]
Messages 57xx
00:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Brian J. Fox
)
01:
Re: Blankley's Challenge (Possible Solution)
(
Ian Lance Taylor
)
02:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
PILCH Hartmut
)
03:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
PILCH Hartmut
)
04:
Re: GNU and classified software
(
Ben Laurie
)
05:
Re: PriorArt.org & Patenting
(
Bernard Lang
)
06:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Seth Gordon
)
07:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Philippe.Aigrain.cec.eu.int
)
08:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Ravicher, Daniel B.
)
09:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Seth Gordon
)
10:
Re: GNU and classified software
(
Jonathan S. Shapiro
)
11:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Frank BENNETT (フランク ベネット )
)
12:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Seth David Schoen
)
13:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Michael A. Olson
)
14:
Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!?
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
15:
Re: GNU and classified software
(
Crispin Cowan
)
16:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Richard Stallman
)
17:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Richard Stallman
)
18:
License Question
(
Crispin Cowan
)
19:
OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...)
(
Adam Theo
)
20:
Re: License Question
(
Lynn Winebarger
)
21:
Re: GNU and classified software
(
Karsten M. Self
)
22:
OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...)
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
23:
License Question
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
24:
Re: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...)
(
Steve Mallett
)
25:
Re: License Question
(
Randy Terbush
)
26:
Re: GNU and classified software
(
Norbert Bollow
)
27:
Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!?
(
Russell Nelson
)
28:
Re: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...)
(
Adam Theo
)
29:
Re: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...)
(
Tim O'Reilly
)
30:
Open source successes (Was: Re: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...))
(
Ian Lance Taylor
)
31:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Richard Stallman
)
32:
Re: [Freesw] priorart.org
(
Frank BENNETT (フランク ベネット )
)
33:
Andrew Leonard is sounding gloomy.
(
Keith Bostic
)
34:
[Freesw] moderately snide MSNBC benchmark reporting
(
jean_camp.harvard.edu
)
35:
a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Seth Gordon
)
36:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Simon Cozens
)
37:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Ian Lance Taylor
)
38:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Seth Gordon
)
39:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Mark Rauterkus
)
40:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Seth Gordon
)
41:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Russell Nelson
)
42:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Tom Hull
)
43:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Brian J. Fox
)
44:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Russell Nelson
)
45:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Ian Lance Taylor
)
46:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
DJ Delorie
)
47:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Russell Nelson
)
48:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Tom Hull
)
49:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Tim O'Reilly
)
50:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Karsten M. Self
)
51:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
52:
a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
53:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
54:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
55:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Bob Young
)
56:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Simon Cozens
)
57:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Russell Nelson
)
58:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Steve Mallett
)
59:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
60:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
61:
Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (LONG. COMPREHENSIVE)
(
kragen.pobox.com
)
62:
Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (LONG. COMPREHENSIVE)
(
kragen.pobox.com
)
63:
Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (LONG. COMPREHENSIVE)
(
kragen.pobox.com
)
64:
Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (LONG. COMPREHENSIVE)
(
Russell Nelson
)
65:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
66:
Lists for Newbies and Blankley's Challenge.
(
Adam Theo
)
67:
Access denied: A copyright battle - Tech News - CNET.com
(
Tim O'Reilly
)
68:
Re: Access denied: A copyright battle - Tech News - CNET.com
(
Steve Mallett
)
69:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
kragen.pobox.com
)
70:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
kragen.pobox.com
)
71:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
72:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
73:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Karsten M. Self
)
74:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Rich Morin
)
75:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Karsten M. Self
)
76:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Gregory Sutter
)
77:
Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software
(
Rich Morin
)
78:
[FYI] Frits Bolkestein (Member of the European Commission) on SWPAT
(
Axel H Horns
)
79:
Insurer Considers Microsoft NT High-Risk
(
Keith Bostic
)
80:
Clay Shirky on hailstorm
(
Tim O'Reilly
)
81:
Re: Clay Shirky on hailstorm
(
Morbus Iff
)
82:
Re: Clay Shirky on hailstorm
(
Ben_Tilly.trepp.com
)
83:
Project spec
(
Frank BENNETT (フランク ベネット )
)
84:
Re: bills on the hill
(
Jean Camp
)
85:
Re: License Question
(
Brian Behlendorf
)
86:
Re: License Question
(
Karsten M. Self
)
87:
dumb GPL question
(
Bernard Lang
)
88:
Re: dumb GPL question
(
Ian Lance Taylor
)
89:
Re: dumb GPL question
(
Greg Broiles
)
90:
Re: dumb GPL question
(
Werner Koch
)
91:
Invitation for Comment
(
Ravicher, Daniel B.
)
92:
Re: License Question
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
93:
Another dumb GPL question
(
Al Davis
)
94:
Re: Another dumb GPL question
(
Rich Morin
)
95:
Another dumb GPL question
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
96:
dumb GPL question
(
Stephen J. Turnbull
)
97:
Re: Another dumb GPL question
(
Kyle Sparger
)
98:
Open Content
(
Steve Mallett
)
99:
Re: Open Content
(
Simon Cozens
)
[<<-]
[<-]
[->]
[->>]
|
[Threads by date]
[Subscribe To List]
[List FAQ]