Messages 57xx


00: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Brian J. Fox)
01: Re: Blankley's Challenge (Possible Solution) (Ian Lance Taylor)
02: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (PILCH Hartmut)
03: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (PILCH Hartmut)
04: Re: GNU and classified software (Ben Laurie)
05: Re: PriorArt.org & Patenting (Bernard Lang)
06: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Seth Gordon)
07: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Philippe.Aigrain.cec.eu.int)
08: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Ravicher, Daniel B.)
09: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Seth Gordon)
10: Re: GNU and classified software (Jonathan S. Shapiro)
11: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Frank BENNETT (フランク ベネット ))
12: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Seth David Schoen)
13: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Michael A. Olson)
14: Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (Stephen J. Turnbull)
15: Re: GNU and classified software (Crispin Cowan)
16: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Richard Stallman)
17: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Richard Stallman)
18: License Question (Crispin Cowan)
19: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...) (Adam Theo)
20: Re: License Question (Lynn Winebarger)
21: Re: GNU and classified software (Karsten M. Self)
22: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...) (Stephen J. Turnbull)
23: License Question (Stephen J. Turnbull)
24: Re: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...) (Steve Mallett)
25: Re: License Question (Randy Terbush)
26: Re: GNU and classified software (Norbert Bollow)
27: Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (Russell Nelson)
28: Re: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...) (Adam Theo)
29: Re: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...) (Tim O'Reilly)
30: Open source successes (Was: Re: OT-ness and a new list? (Was: Opportunity lost?...)) (Ian Lance Taylor)
31: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Richard Stallman)
32: Re: [Freesw] priorart.org (Frank BENNETT (フランク ベネット ))
33: Andrew Leonard is sounding gloomy. (Keith Bostic)
34: [Freesw] moderately snide MSNBC benchmark reporting (jean_camp.harvard.edu)
35: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Seth Gordon)
36: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Simon Cozens)
37: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Ian Lance Taylor)
38: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Seth Gordon)
39: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Mark Rauterkus)
40: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Seth Gordon)
41: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Russell Nelson)
42: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Tom Hull)
43: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Brian J. Fox)
44: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Russell Nelson)
45: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Ian Lance Taylor)
46: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (DJ Delorie)
47: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Russell Nelson)
48: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Tom Hull)
49: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Tim O'Reilly)
50: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Karsten M. Self)
51: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
52: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
53: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
54: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
55: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Bob Young)
56: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Simon Cozens)
57: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Russell Nelson)
58: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Steve Mallett)
59: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
60: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
61: Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (LONG. COMPREHENSIVE) (kragen.pobox.com)
62: Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (LONG. COMPREHENSIVE) (kragen.pobox.com)
63: Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (LONG. COMPREHENSIVE) (kragen.pobox.com)
64: Re: Opportunity lost? Challenge declined!? (LONG. COMPREHENSIVE) (Russell Nelson)
65: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
66: Lists for Newbies and Blankley's Challenge. (Adam Theo)
67: Access denied: A copyright battle - Tech News - CNET.com (Tim O'Reilly)
68: Re: Access denied: A copyright battle - Tech News - CNET.com (Steve Mallett)
69: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (kragen.pobox.com)
70: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (kragen.pobox.com)
71: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
72: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Stephen J. Turnbull)
73: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Karsten M. Self)
74: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Rich Morin)
75: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Karsten M. Self)
76: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Gregory Sutter)
77: Re: a model of competition between free and proprietary software (Rich Morin)
78: [FYI] Frits Bolkestein (Member of the European Commission) on SWPAT (Axel H Horns)
79: Insurer Considers Microsoft NT High-Risk (Keith Bostic)
80: Clay Shirky on hailstorm (Tim O'Reilly)
81: Re: Clay Shirky on hailstorm (Morbus Iff)
82: Re: Clay Shirky on hailstorm (Ben_Tilly.trepp.com)
83: Project spec (Frank BENNETT (フランク ベネット ))
84: Re: bills on the hill (Jean Camp)
85: Re: License Question (Brian Behlendorf)
86: Re: License Question (Karsten M. Self)
87: dumb GPL question (Bernard Lang)
88: Re: dumb GPL question (Ian Lance Taylor)
89: Re: dumb GPL question (Greg Broiles)
90: Re: dumb GPL question (Werner Koch)
91: Invitation for Comment (Ravicher, Daniel B.)
92: Re: License Question (Stephen J. Turnbull)
93: Another dumb GPL question (Al Davis)
94: Re: Another dumb GPL question (Rich Morin)
95: Another dumb GPL question (Stephen J. Turnbull)
96: dumb GPL question (Stephen J. Turnbull)
97: Re: Another dumb GPL question (Kyle Sparger)
98: Open Content (Steve Mallett)
99: Re: Open Content (Simon Cozens)