Messages 99xx


00: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (Stephen J. Turnbull)
01: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (Brian Behlendorf)
02: Re: (c) permission on multi-authored works (Stephen J. Turnbull)
03: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Stephen J. Turnbull)
04: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (Stephen J. Turnbull)
05: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (Joe Corneli)
06: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (cody koeninger)
07: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Ralph Corderoy)
08: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (DV Henkel-Wallace)
09: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Brian Behlendorf)
10: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (cody koeninger)
11: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (cody koeninger)
12: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (David Ascher)
13: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Lawrence Rosen)
14: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (Stephen J. Turnbull)
15: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Stephen J. Turnbull)
16: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Stephen J. Turnbull)
17: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (David Ascher)
18: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (cody koeninger)
19: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (cody koeninger)
20: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Ben Tilly)
21: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Brian Behlendorf)
22: Re: Standing on multi-authored works (Lawrence Rosen)
23: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (Russell Nelson)
24: Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government (Laurent GUERBY)
25: Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects? (Ben Laurie)
26: Can Open Src Projects be Acquired? (Marshall W. Van Alstyne)
27: Re: Can Open Src Projects be Acquired? (Nik Cubrilovic)
28: Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?] (Laurent GUERBY)
29: Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?] (Laurent GUERBY)
30: Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?] (Marshall W. Van Alstyne)
31: Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?] (Laurent GUERBY)
32: Re: Charging the Charger (Stephen J. Turnbull)
33: Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?] (Marshall W. Van Alstyne)
34: Re: Charging the Charger (Marshall W. Van Alstyne)
35: Open Source -> Closed Source (Anderson, Kelly)
36: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Jamie Lokier)
37: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Stephen J. Turnbull)
38: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Santiago Gala)
39: Re: Software as a public service (Peter Wayner)
40: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (jean_camp)
41: Re: Software as a public service (Robin 'Roblimo' Miller)
42: Re: Software as a public service (Seth Johnson)
43: Re: Software as a public service (Russell McOrmond)
44: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Jamie Lokier)
45: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Alexandre Oliva)
46: Re: Software as a public service (Frank Hecker)
47: Re: Software as a public service (Joe Corneli)
48: Re: Software as a public service (Stephen J. Turnbull)
49: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Stephen J. Turnbull)
50: Re: Software as a public service (Frank Hecker)
51: Re: Software as a public service (Frank Hecker)
52: Re: Software as a public service (Stephen J. Turnbull)
53: Re: Software as a public service (Santiago Gala)
54: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Santiago Gala)
55: Re: Software as a public service (Alan Hudson)
56: Re: Software as a public service (Bernard Lang)
57: Re: Software as a public service (Joe Corneli)
58: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Laurent GUERBY)
59: Down with the GPL! (DV Henkel-Wallace)
60: Re: Down with the GPL! (Lajos Moczar)
61: Re: Software as a public service (Russell McOrmond)
62: Re: Software as a public service (Alan Hudson)
63: Re: Down with the GPL! (Laurent GUERBY)
64: Re: Down with the GPL! (Anderson, Kelly)
65: Re: Down with the GPL! (Laurent GUERBY)
66: Re: Down with the GPL! (DV Henkel-Wallace)
67: Re: Down with the GPL! (Chris Maeda)
68: Re: Down with the GPL! (DV Henkel-Wallace)
69: Re: Down with the GPL! (Chris Maeda)
70: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Cliff Schmidt)
71: Re: Down with the GPL! (Chris Maeda)
72: Re: Down with the GPL! (DV Henkel-Wallace)
73: Re: Software as a public service (Stephen J. Turnbull)
74: Re: Software as a public service (Stephen J. Turnbull)
75: Re: Down with the GPL! (Laurent GUERBY)
76: Re: Software as a public service (Stephen J. Turnbull)
77: Re: Software as a public service (Stephen J. Turnbull)
78: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Stephen J. Turnbull)
79: Re: Down with the GPL! (Stephen J. Turnbull)
80: Re: Down with the GPL! (RaphaŽl Luta)
81: Re: Software as a public service (Santiago Gala)
82: Re: Open Source -> Closed Source (Santiago Gala)
83: Re: Down with the GPL! (Chris Maeda)
84: Re: Software as a public service (Russell McOrmond)
85: Re: Down with the GPL! (DV Henkel-Wallace)
86: Re: Down with the GPL! (DV Henkel-Wallace)
87: Re: Down with the GPL! (DV Henkel-Wallace)
88: Re: Software as a public service (Ben Tilly)
89: Re: Down with the GPL! (Laurent GUERBY)
90: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Laurent GUERBY)
91: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Adam Turoff)
92: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (David Fetter)
93: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Cliff Schmidt)
94: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Lajos Moczar)
95: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Adam Turoff)
96: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Cliff Schmidt)
97: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (David N. Welton)
98: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (Cliff Schmidt)
99: Re: Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source (David Fetter)