Subject: Re: Novel anti-software-patent article
From: <kmself@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:49:19 -0800
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:49:19 -0800
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 06:27:56AM -0500, Brian Bartholomew wrote:
> This article seems to propose a legal attack on the software patent
> system that I haven't seen before:
> 
> 	http://www2.linuxjournal.com/articles/currents/014.html

Pfaffenberger has been published in a couple of places over the past few
months.  What specific legal defense did you find in the article --
revising the definition of 'art'?  I'm not clear on your intent.

> Or maybe it's just legal history I wasn't aware of.  In any case, the
> list has been dead lately :-)
> 
> 
> A member of the League for Programming Freedom (LPF) http://lpf.ai.mit.edu
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brian Bartholomew - bb@wv.com - www.wv.com - Working Version, Cambridge, MA

-- 
Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com)
    What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?

SAS for Linux: http://www.netcom.com/~kmself/SAS/SAS4Linux.html
Mailing list:  "subscribe sas-linux" to mailto:majordomo@cranfield.ac.uk


["application/pgp-signature" not shown]