Subject: Re: Releasing Under Artistic License
From: "Karsten M. Self" <>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 07:38:05 -0700
Sun, 1 Jul 2001 07:38:05 -0700
on Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 09:32:42PM -0400, Adam Theo ( wrote:
> Hello, Adam Theo here;
> i have learned of version 2.0 of the artistic license, and want to know 
> what everyone thinks of using that one, since when i wrote my previous 
> post i was talking about the original version.
> supposedly the artistic license version 2.0 fixes the loopholes and 
> clarifies it better. anyone know of this new version? where i can find 
> the lastest version of it? any comments? thanks.

Note that my previous comments mostly pertain to the earlier versions of
the AL, which I haven't read very closely for a while, and I haven't
followed updates.  Not familiar with 2.0.

Karsten M. Self <>
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
   Are these opinions my employer's?  Hah!  I don't believe them myself!

["application/pgp-signature" not shown]