Subject: Re: Releasing Under Artistic License
From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 07:38:05 -0700
Sun, 1 Jul 2001 07:38:05 -0700
on Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 09:32:42PM -0400, Adam Theo (adamtheo@theoretic.com) wrote:
> 
> Hello, Adam Theo here;
> 
> i have learned of version 2.0 of the artistic license, and want to know 
> what everyone thinks of using that one, since when i wrote my previous 
> post i was talking about the original version.
> 
> supposedly the artistic license version 2.0 fixes the loopholes and 
> clarifies it better. anyone know of this new version? where i can find 
> the lastest version of it? any comments? thanks.

Note that my previous comments mostly pertain to the earlier versions of
the AL, which I haven't read very closely for a while, and I haven't
followed updates.  Not familiar with 2.0.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>    http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/         http://www.kuro5hin.org
   Are these opinions my employer's?  Hah!  I don't believe them myself!


["application/pgp-signature" not shown]