Subject: Re: A few here may have an opinion on this
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:40:50 +0900

>>>>> "Seth" == Seth Gordon <seth@genome.wi.mit.edu> writes:

    Seth> "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
    >>
    rn> In any case, the problem here is not that you're not using
    rn> reciprocal, it's that you are using viral.
    >> OK, I'll stop then.  But I really wish someone would come up
    >> with an equally accurate and evocative term.

    Seth> How about "tit-for-tat", alluding to the iterated Prisoner's
    Seth> Dilemma strategy?

"Tit-for-tat" just another way of saying "reciprocal".

-- 
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences     http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
 My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things.  I don't
have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember.  Scott Gilbert c.l.py