Subject: Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
From: Seth Johnson <>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 23:26:46 -0400

Better yet, I propose that we all make an effort to stop
contraposing the "we" against those who are, shall we say,
consistent about particular political or practical commitments.

Let me also propose that people stop freaking out in general. 
RMS is a particularly emulative example of good practice in that
area.  That would include not freaking out when anybody makes a
stipulation such as I did in the email you have just attempted to
characterize that way.


Thomas Lord wrote:
> That's instance #2, where instance #1 was on a different topic.
> I propose that as a general rule, people not freak out about the
> use of the word "we" on this list.   It's obvious from the start
> that nobody represents the positions of all list (or even thread)
> members.  Meanwhile, "we" can mean things like "those
> people who you can see from their statements do agree on
> this point" or even "me, although we demure from using
> first person singular because we are quaint that way."
> Sheesh.
> We hope you agree,
> -t
> Seth Johnson wrote:
> > Ahem.
> >
> > So are *you,* Stephen.  I am among the "we," and not among your
> > "we" in this matter.  Speak for yourself and those who insist on
> > using this term.
> >
> > Not "everybody on this list except Richard Stallman and those who
> > also avoid use of the term."
> >
> >
> > Seth Johnson
> >
> >
> >
> > "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
> >
> >>>>>>> "rms" == Richard Stallman <> writes:
> >>>>>>>
> >>     rms> However, I am trying to do more than just avoid making false
> >>     rms> statements; I am trying to thwart a propaganda campaign which
> >>     rms> often leads others into confused thinking and false beliefs.
> >>
> >> So are we, Richard; so are we.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering   University of Tsukuba
> >>        Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
> >>         Economics of Information Communication and Computation Systems
> >>           Experimental Economics, Microeconomic Theory, Game Theory
> >>
> >
> >


RIAA is the RISK!  Our NET is P2P!

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use

[CC] Counter-copyright:

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. 
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so
far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in
ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.