Subject: Re: free software vs. open source
From: skud+usenet@netizen.com.au (Kirrily 'Skud' Robert)
Date: 24 Nov 1999 00:09:21 GMT

In article <199911240004.QAA23006@triplerock.olsons.net>, Michael A. Olson 
wrote:
>FSB is mostly about "free," occasionally about "software," and
>almost never about "business."  It's clear from the traffic that
>there's an audience interested in that mix.  Personally, I'd
>be more interested in a list that focused on business issues --
>maybe "BOS", for "Business of Open Source."

Ooooh, you're *so* right.

>For example, the Red Hat/Cygnus deal has burned a lot of
>phosphor already, but I haven't seen much discussion at all
>about some of the really interesting questions that underlie
>it.  RH paid some serious money for Cygnus (and congratulations
>to our colleagues there, whose commitment has now paid off
>the old-fashioned way).  What did both sides see as the basis
>for the valuation?

This is the sort of thing I'd really like to discuss, to be honest.
Anyone else?

K.

-- 
Kirrily Robert -- <skud@netizen.com.au> -- http://netizen.com.au/
Internet and Open Source Development, Consulting and Training
Level 13, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000
Phone: +61 3 9602 2452   Mobile: +61 419 119 429