Subject: Re: FSBs and mechanized documentation
From: "Ben Tilly" <btilly@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:36:34 -0800

 Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:36:34 -0800
On 3/8/06, simo <s@ssimo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:56 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> > The software may be free, but by that very token the information is
> > not.  All the definitions of "free" I know of say that you may not
> > make any restrictions on how the software is used, although both the
> > FDL and GPLv3 do so.
>
> I found this claim interesting, which restrictions does the FDL and
> GPLv3 put on the use ?

I suspect that Stephen is talking about the anti-DRM provisions in GPLv3.

Cheers,
Ben