Subject: Re: DRM-incompatible licenses
From: Brian Behlendorf <>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:02:03 -0700 (PDT)

On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Randy Kramer wrote:
> On Friday 14 April 2006 04:57 am, you wrote:
>>>>>>> "Jamie" == Jamie Lokier <> writes:
>> A moderately accurate version would be "trusted-by-content-vendors
>> computing".
> Thanks, that is useful!  Maybe we can work on shortening that--the next step I
> can see is "vendor trusted computing" (or "supplier trusted computing").  I'd
> like to find something even shorter but still clear--anybody?

Big Brother Computing?  Or should we save that for the AT&T/NSA 
interconnect romance?