Subject: Re: The term "intellectual property" considered useful
From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 22:46:04 -0400


Ahem.

So are *you,* Stephen.  I am among the "we," and not among your
"we" in this matter.  Speak for yourself and those who insist on
using this term.

Not "everybody on this list except Richard Stallman and those who
also avoid use of the term."


Seth Johnson



"Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "rms" == Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> 
>     rms> However, I am trying to do more than just avoid making false
>     rms> statements; I am trying to thwart a propaganda campaign which
>     rms> often leads others into confused thinking and false beliefs.
> 
> So are we, Richard; so are we.
> 
> --
> Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering   University of Tsukuba
> http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/        Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
>         Economics of Information Communication and Computation Systems
>           Experimental Economics, Microeconomic Theory, Game Theory

-- 

RIAA is the RISK!  Our NET is P2P!
http://www.nyfairuse.org/action/ftc

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org

[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. 
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so
far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in
ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.