Subject: Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
From: <stephen@xemacs.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:16:50 +0900

Norbert Bollow writes:

 > insights".  Certainly, demand-inducing innovations qualify as
 > impressive "breakthrough insights".

You do realize that you have just qualified any sufficiently effective
marketing campaign as a "breakthrough insight"?

Think about it, and then maybe we can communicate.  But at this point
you're obviously not interested in understanding what I have to say,
only in arguing against it.