Subject: Re: "incentive void" (was Re: A different patent covenant...)
From: <stephen@xemacs.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:50:30 +0900

Norbert Bollow writes:
 > <stephen@xemacs.org> wrote:
 > > Norbert Bollow writes:
 > > 
 > >  > insights".  Certainly, demand-inducing innovations qualify as
 > >  > impressive "breakthrough insights".
 > > 
 > > You do realize that you have just qualified any sufficiently effective
 > > marketing campaign as a "breakthrough insight"?
 > 
 > Again you misunderstand and/or misrepresent what I wrote.

Excuse me, but I introduced the term "demand-inducing innovation".
Please don't hijack my words to mean something else, then accuse me of
misunderstanding.