Subject: Re: Thoughts on GPL
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: 2 Mar 1998 22:02:00 -0000
Keith Bostic writes:
> Nobody is making money from selling software that's GPL'd.
> There are add-on companies, there are bundlers, there are
> support organizations, hardware vendors and so forth. I need
> an example of a company that wrote an application, GPL'd it,
> and is now selling it, expecting to make a profit on those
> software sales alone.
Isn't that exactly what Cygnus is doing? Read their ads. There's
nary a mention of the word "free", nor "support" in there. They even
changed their name from Cygnus Support to Cygnus Solutions.
> I don't dispute that it's possible to GPL an application and
> then build the company that offers support and enhancements.
> But my statement was that a company with a larger marketing
> and/or support organization can take over your work, and, that,
> even if that doesn't happen, application writers are forced to
> build sales/marketing organizations to make a profit from their
> work.
In a perfectly free market, you are perfectly correct. We'll never
have a perfectly free market, and there's money to be made from it.
Same reason PennzOil and Quaker State Motor Oil make money -- by
solving friction problems.
> Here's the easy win: give me an example of a product where the
> vendor is giving away the source code under the GPL or similar
> license, and selling the same software, intending to profit from
> nothing other than sales of that software.
Aladdin. Do I win?
--
-russ <nelson@crynwr.com> http://web.crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | Freedom is the primary
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | cause of Peace, Love,
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | Truth and Justice.