Brian Bartholomew writes:
 > > I am sure that the OSI board would reject use licensing, because it
 > > recently did just that.
 > 
 > Why was it rejected?  Because charging for use is not what OSS is
 > about?

It was Larry McVoy's proposed BitKeeper license.  The license included
a requirement to run a regression test, required notification of use,
and prohibited modifications.  It wasn't a use license per se, but it
amounted to one.

-- 
-russ nelson <rn-sig@crynwr.com>  http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok |   There is good evidence
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice |   that freedom is the
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   |   cause of world peace.