Subject: Re: proprietary -- a truism
From: "Stig Hackvan" <stig@hackvan.com>
Date: 12 Apr 1999 10:25:08 -0000




Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> 
>     >> I would rather the term 'free software' be reserved for those
>     >> things which are truly managed as donations to the world.  Some
>     >> other term should be invented for things which are mostly free.
> 
>     Ben> Like "open source", for example?
> 
> Well, yes, except that that can be confused with Open Source[tm].  We
> need something with more elasticity to it, that can be applied to
> pieces of a whole in a convenient way, and according to spirit as well
> as technicalities.  Maybe "published source"?

I tend to use "source-available" to describe whatever lies between "Open
Source" and "proprietary."

-- 
Stig        ...  Friend of Hacking      ...  707-987-3236 work@home
Hackvšn      ...  http://hackvan.com     ...  415-264-8754 mobile
We are (b)Org ...  http://brainofstig.AI  ...  stig@hackvan.com

Feed on "Brain of Stig" ---- http://brainofstig.AI/subscribe/