Subject: Re: EROS license
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
shapj@us.ibm.com writes:
> However, I don't agree with the second point. I haven't read the requirements
> on BitKeeper, but in principle requiring conformance to a test suite isn't a bad
> thing. I believe Larry is doing this because he views branding as important.
Nope. The test suite is there to enforce the use license which
requires publication of changelogs. An Open-Source-oriented test
suite would say ``If your tavern accounting software passes this test
suite, you may use the brand name Foo Bar(tm)''.
--
-russ nelson <rn-sig@crynwr.com> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | Government schools are so
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool!