Subject: Re: EROS license
From: Ian Lance Taylor <>
Date: 28 Jun 1999 12:33:20 -0400

   From: Russell Nelson <>
   Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:22:55 -0400 (EDT) writes:
    > However, I don't agree with the second point.  I haven't read the requirements
    > on BitKeeper, but in principle requiring conformance to a test suite isn't a bad
    > thing.  I believe Larry is doing this because he views branding as important.

   Nope.  The test suite is there to enforce the use license which
   requires publication of changelogs.

I believe Larry rejects even the idea of permitting the testsuite to
change with a special exception for always testing the use license.
He really does want to require that the entire testsuite pass.