Subject: Re: Net Rules and Net Keys.
From: kmself@ix.netcom.com
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:56:02 -0800
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:56:02 -0800
on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:58:13PM +0000, Ben Laurie (ben@algroup.co.uk) wrote:
> Crispin Cowan wrote:
> > On the net, I MUST reveal something
> > identifying if I ever expect to receive my purchase.  So the net is intrinsically
> > more invasive of privacy:  there IS a reason why it should (must!)
> > be different on the net.
> 
> This is not inherently true, consider blinded cash in exchange for a
> download via onion-routing. Nothing revealed. Value exchanged.
> 
> Currently the blinded cash bit is a sticking point, but I feel it won't
> be for much longer.

David Chaum.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>    http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/         http://www.kuro5hin.org


["application/pgp-signature" not shown]