Subject: LGPL... variations on a theme
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 16:45:37 +0900

>>>>> "Bernard" == Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr> writes:

    Bernard> 1- The company above, that wishes to free a large (and
    Bernard> very valuable) system, does not want to spend any
    Bernard> ressources on that, and in particular in cutting the code
    Bernard> into modules to allow the use of the LGPL.

Where's the problem?  Release the whole thing under the LGPL, let the
users do the cutting.  What makes you think that's not allowed?  True,
the separated modules may constitute new works, but they must still be
LGPL (at least).  This should meet the company's concerns.

-- 
University of Tsukuba                Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences       Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________  _________________  _________________  _________________
What are those straight lines for?  "XEmacs rules."