Subject: Re: LGPL... variations on a theme
From: Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:33:48 +0200


I guess I do not sleep enough ...

Thanks

I guess that is why this first point did not bother me so much,
  my guts are smarter than my brain

   Bernard

On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:45:37PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >>>>> "Bernard" == Bernard Lang <Bernard.Lang@inria.fr> writes:
> 
>     Bernard> 1- The company above, that wishes to free a large (and
>     Bernard> very valuable) system, does not want to spend any
>     Bernard> ressources on that, and in particular in cutting the code
>     Bernard> into modules to allow the use of the LGPL.
> 
> Where's the problem?  Release the whole thing under the LGPL, let the
> users do the cutting.  What makes you think that's not allowed?  True,
> the separated modules may constitute new works, but they must still be
> LGPL (at least).  This should meet the company's concerns.
> 
> -- 
> University of Tsukuba                Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
> Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences       Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
> _________________  _________________  _________________  _________________
> What are those straight lines for?  "XEmacs rules."

-- 
         Non aux Brevets Logiciels  -  No to Software Patents
           SIGNEZ    http://petition.eurolinux.org/    SIGN

Bernard.Lang@inria.fr             ,_  /\o    \o/    Tel  +33 1 3963 5644
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  Fax  +33 1 3963 5469
            INRIA / B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX / France
         Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
                 CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX