Subject: Re: Journal / Trade Mag?
From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:46:35 -0500


See:

> http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_00/


Seth


Phil Hughes wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:22:25AM -0700, John McDermott wrote:
> >
> > Yesterday I was reading a trade computer magazine.  One of those free ones
> > many of us get.  It had a review of SSL VPN gateways.  All were
> > commercial.  No open source products were mentioned.  The commercial
> > products had a base price way over that affordable by most SMBs.
> >
> > I have had clients use expensive commercial products because they were
> > unaware of viable FLOSS alternatives.  Many of us probably have.
> >
> > One client chose products to use based on what one executive read in trade
> > pubs.  Clearly they used little open source because there were few
> > articles about it in the trade pubs he read.
> >
> > Is anyone considering some sort of trade pub to show users how to
> > deploy/integrate FLOSS or even evaluating such software?  It would be very
> > valuable, I think, if we could help businesses see that Open Source is a
> > good business choice and why.
> 
> This isn't unique to software. People buy things because they have
> heard about them. Living in Nicaragua makes me see how "things used to
> be". That is, word of mouth is the most important advertising medium.
> 
> To give you a little Linux Journal history, before LJ was born I was
> talking with half a dozen friends about a "Free Software" magazine. We
> all saw the need but our conclusion was that it would have to be like
> Consumer Reports to work--that is, free of advertising/advertiser
> influence. We decided we would need $10 million to get such a magazine
> going, checked our finances and came up about $9,999,990 short. I
> suggested that we just do a Linux magazine as a joke. Eleven years
> later I guess the joke issue is gone.
> 
> In any case, with LJ we try to balance commercial and free answers.
> That way, people are offered a choice and we can pay the printing
> bills. It also lets us say "this commercial product is a lot better
> than the free stuff" or (more often than not) this particular free
> thing is better than the other choices.
> 
> I still like the idea of "Consumer Reports of Software" where you can
> really compare all the choices--commercial and non-commercial but, for
> a magazine that is mostly reviews to survive, you need to find someone
> to pay the bills. It is hard for an IT manager to justify a subscription
> to a $500/year (random number) magazine when there are all the "free
> answers" out there. Of course, that $500 would get saved very quickly
> but, again, that is hard to explain.
> --
> Phil Hughes, fyl@a42.com  Phone: 505-841-2675
> Aptdo. Postal 201, Esteli, Esteli, NICARAGUA
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.1 - Release Date: 2/27/05

-- 

RIAA is the RISK!  Our NET is P2P!
http://www.nyfairuse.org/action/ftc

DRM is Theft!  We are the Stakeholders!

New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org

[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. 
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so
far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in
ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.